From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jun 27 13:22:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A219837B408; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18322; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:21:50 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook is dangerous and makes your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020627142008.024fd570@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:21:37 -0600 To: Stefano Riva , Robert Watson , Matthew Dillon , Eric Anderson From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:28.resolv Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020627205338.00943100@civetta.gufi.org> References: <200206271658.g5RGweBm068044@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:53 PM 6/27/2002, Stefano Riva wrote: >Probably a 4.6.1 release >would become easy food for trolls, also because many people remember the >overall quality of 4.1.1. Fixing bugs is ALWAYS the responsible thing to do. I'd vote in favor of a point release and would be willing to help with the engineering (to the extent that I can, given that I'm not a committer). Perhaps 4.6.1 could demonstrate that 4.1.1 was a fluke. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message