From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 12 14:36:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns.clientlogic.com (ns.clientlogic.com [207.51.66.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B6E14BE0 for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 14:36:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ChrisMic@clientlogic.com) Received: by site0s1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 12 May 1999 17:36:46 -0400 Message-ID: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB44011058A6@site2s1> From: Christopher Michaels To: 'Doug White' Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: y2k compliance version Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:38:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does that imply that 2.2.8 isn't y2k compliant? I thought that 2.2.8 was still going to be supported for "critical updates" -Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug White [SMTP:dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 4:58 PM > To: Kenneth Woo > Cc: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG' > Subject: Re: y2k compliance version > > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Kenneth Woo wrote: > > > This message bounced for the bugs address. Could you forward or > > answer the question? > > > > ---------- > > From: Kenneth Woo > > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 12:51 PM > > To: 'freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG' > > > > I have been reading you statement for the y2k compliance, the question > > that I have is, which version of FreeBSD has all the fixes > > incorporated? > > They should be in 3.1 and later. > > Doug White > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message