From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 01:09:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3601737B401 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3BE43F85 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 01:09:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3E89iSA006815; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:09:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: matt From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:09:59 CDT." <20030413174853.F57816-100000@grogged.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:09:44 +0200 Message-ID: <6814.1050307784@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GBDE + md() + ccd() = corruption? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:09:48 -0000 In message <20030413174853.F57816-100000@grogged.dyndns.org>, matt writes: > >Quick question (please CC me, as I'm not on the list yet) - > >I have 4x files setup through the md device (md1, md2, md3, mde4), each of >which I have init'd and attached gbde to (successfully), for md1.bde, >md2.bde, etc... I've used ccdconfig to make these 4 encrypted devices >a concatenated disk (ccd0c), where upon I newfs'd /dev/ccd0c and >successfully mounted it. Ok, I just found and fixed one bad bug in ccd with respect to ENOMEM: it would never return the I/O request in question. You want to pull in version 1.133 of sys/dev/ccd/ccd.c -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.