From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 22:55:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA35C16A4CF; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938C443D49; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0IMxeZJ003664; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:59:40 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0IMxe41003663; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:59:40 -0800 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:59:40 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050118225940.GA31663@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050117200610.GA90866@cell.sick.ru> <20050118183558.GA15150@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41ED8D63.8090205@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41ED8D63.8090205@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: current@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] ng_ipfw: node to glue together ipfw(4) and netgraph(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:34 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:27:47PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >=20 > Looks good but I'm not convinced that it needs a whole new keyword of > we tap in through the divert mechanism. FWIW, keywords are very cheap and generally quite clean in ipfw2. I'd be more concerned in ipfw1. -- Brooks --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB7ZTbXY6L6fI4GtQRAsqNAJ0TRSokXVosZRrdYcpjj5kvf5IO0wCePJMA gOYqFLchzlOuvNrWr8Ro8zM= =5sTQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--