Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:38:06 -0600
From:      Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   portsentry in combination with ipfilter
Message-ID:  <20030212043806.GA1267@darkpossum>

index | next in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
hi all

 i have an ipf/ipnat gateway machine protecting an internal network of - so far one, hopefully 2 or more - computers.
 the first thing i did after i observed that i have my setup successfully nat'ing, was to try to portscan myself from an outside machine, using nmap.
 at first i thought something was up, and that my ipf.rules were being ignored, because when i ran
 
 nmap -sS -v -O 

 on my the public ip of my internal host - which was aliased to the external nic of my gateway box - it showed that a huge amount of tcp and udp ports were open. i could copy the nmap results, but they're long, and suffice it to say ports i thought were closed or inactive were shown as open.
 
 after discussing it with the -security listserv, and running a 'sockstat' on the gateway box, it turns out that portsentry was indeed listening on the great majority of ports that the nmap showed to be open. when i turn portsentry off and run nmap again on my setup, it only shows ports that i specially allow open in my ipf/ipnat rules like 80,22, etc.
 
 my question is: first if anyone knows how to get portsentry to not broadcast the fact that it's listening on a wide variety ports when the host is being portscanned. i checked the portsentry.conf file, there didn't seem to be an option for this. also - i have
 
 block return-rst in log quick on xl0 proto tcp from any to any
 
 in my ipf.rules, so i thought that any ports not be nat'd would show up in portscans as not listening. not sure why this isn't working.
 
 also, i had wanted to run logcheck, portsentry, and snort or tripwire on my ipf/ipnat gateway box. is this a good combination of apps? as of now, i have portsentry turned off, but would like to use it or an app that performs the same function.
 
 any thoughts?
 
 thanks again

redmond

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+Sc+uFNjun16SvHYRAqXaAJ99tM0EzKiHEJAoei9VXRoy1XXUqwCgqgbc
BhWJlLD6DA9W7ovzoxPLxh8=
=5h7L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030212043806.GA1267>