From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Dec 6 23:03:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5CE1BA73F for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 23:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47V7Rm3s8wz43Wn for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 23:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xB6N3UZQ001141 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:03:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xB6N3TcG001140; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:03:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:03:29 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: python36 is still broken. Message-ID: <20191206230329.GC949@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20191206184050.GA44417@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47V7Rm3s8wz43Wn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ip: (0.06), ipnet: 128.95.0.0/16(-0.28), asn: 73(-0.84), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:03:33 -0000 On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:41 AM Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > > This has been reported for many years and there are open bug reports. > > Any chance that the this will be fixed. > > > > > > --- work/Python-3.6.9/Modules/mathmodule.c.orig 2019-12-06 10:33:39.232673000 -0800 > > +++ work/Python-3.6.9/Modules/mathmodule.c 2019-12-06 10:34:53.288616000 -0800 > > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ > > static const double logpi = 1.144729885849400174143427351353058711647; > > > > static double > > -sinpi(double x) > > +a_really_bad_idea_sinpi(double x) > > { > > double y, r; > > int n; > > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ > > integer. */ > > if (absx > 200.0) { > > if (x < 0.0) { > > - return 0.0/sinpi(x); > > + return 0.0/a_really_bad_idea_sinpi(x); > > } > > else { > > errno = ERANGE; > > Hi Steve, > > WIthout context it's hard to advise. What PRs with that patch exist? > Have they been responded to or have they been ignored? Team immunity > from PR timeouts no longer exists, so if the problem needs a fix let's > fix it. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 As noted in the PR, it has been reported to the lists https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-June/109093.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-September/110229.html I'll refrain from commenting further. -- Steve