From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jun  4 23:15:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA27696
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA27691
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tom@localhost)
	by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA26206;
	Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To: James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Use of your strptime(3) code (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970604064505.9013B-100000@nexis.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970604231144.19597C-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, James FitzGibbon wrote:

> When I was trying to port mSQL-2.0b5, I needed a strptime(3) call, which
> we don't have.  Although the need for it in mSQL-2 is no longer
> required, it might be a valuable addition to libcompat, since most
> SVR4 systems have it.

  I was a bit confused when I read this.  I built msql-2.0b6 some time
ago, and it built without any problems.

Tom