From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 23:11:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7784A18C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (gribble.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9A9DE0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gribble (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2407F49FCC; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:06:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by gribble (gribble.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlH2e3xcipWJ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:06:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from EGR authenticated sender Message-ID: <54B6F68B.3040403@egr.msu.edu> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:06:51 -0500 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz , freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 migrate FBSD 10/11 results in clock reset to 1970? References: <70A0A91F47C63040B165812D@[10.12.30.106]> <1421268127.1109646.213984377.0E5EC646@webmail.messagingengine.com> <54B6D62F.9090002@egr.msu.edu> <979140BCE806D10DE127B63B@Karls-Mac-mini.local> In-Reply-To: <979140BCE806D10DE127B63B@Karls-Mac-mini.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:11:59 -0000 On 01/14/2015 17:46, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > --On 14 January 2015 15:48:47 -0500 Adam McDougall > wrote: > >> I really thought this was fixed in Creedence alphas that I tested... I >> still have those test systems up but I need to make a test environment >> for 6.5. Are you using AMD or Intel? I don't know if it makes a >> difference but I've only seen the problem on AMD so far. > > We're looking at getting a Creedence test setup soon, so I can re-test > then - at the moment our platform is XenServer 6.5 - with HP Proliant > DL320e's (all Intel / Haswell based). > > I'll check tomorrow to see how far off having a Creedence test setup > will be. > > -Karl Are you sure you are running 6.5 and not 6.2? The guest's kernel should detect Xen 4.4 instead of 4.1. 6.5 is Creedence but it was called Creedence during the long alpha stage before it became 6.5.