From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 11:33:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEE437B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (lakemtao08.cox.net [68.1.17.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BE643F3F for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:33:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from sysinfo.mezzweb.com ([68.103.37.247]) by lakemtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030605183326.GFVD7627.lakemtao08.cox.net@sysinfo.mezzweb.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:33:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:19:04 -0500 To: Alexander Leidinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed References: <20030605161425.71dec07a.Alexander@Leidinger.net> From: Jeremy Messenger MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera7.11/Linux M2 build 406 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIA ACPI power management controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 18:33:29 -0000 On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:10:35 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about >> >> none0@pci0:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 >> hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' >> device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' >> class = bridge >> subclass = PCI-unknown Oh, it seems to be little different but I have the same 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller'.. =============================== none0@pci0:7:4: class=0x0c0500 card=0x30571106 chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' class = serial bus <-- diff here.. subclass = SMBus <-- diff here.. =============================== Cheers, Mezz > I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in > 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES and haven't tried to > put some opinion from 4.x to 5.x yet. I don't know if it will work. > > In 4.x, you just add in the kernel config following: > > =============================== > # VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller > device smbus > device viapm > > device iicbus > device iicbb > > device ic > device iic > device iicsmb > =============================== > > I would like to see someone to bring 4.x drivers to 5.x as well. Too bad, > I know nothing with C, but just a hello world. > > Cheers, > Mezz > >> Bye, >> Alexander. -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.