From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 19 00:30:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE9016A41A for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7089A13C47E for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lBJ0U3Mi023460 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lBJ0U3te023457; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200712190030.lBJ0U3te023457@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Nikos Ntarmos Cc: Subject: Re: ports/116495: [patch] Adding a banch of semi-official patches to x11-wm/dwm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikos Ntarmos List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:30:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/116495; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nikos Ntarmos To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: schot@a-eskwadraat.nl Subject: Re: ports/116495: [patch] Adding a banch of semi-official patches to x11-wm/dwm Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:22:51 +0200 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This bug has been laying dormant for quite some time, and dwm in ports is now in v4.7. I don't intend to support this any longer (reads: I'll not keep updating the patches to apply cleanly for newer versions of the dwm port and just watch them sit in a PR), so I'm totally ok with closing this PR if the maintainer is also ok with it. \n\n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Nikos Ntarmos iD8DBQFHaGRbm6J1ac+VFgoRAkuUAJ4vUrYCn1xjyFMM0wAgB0s/KrqZoACeJMhT ues+flH4uuSrRnf5X7aKIWA= =9VGF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----