From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 18 11:57:20 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFC2106568C;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABF78FC5B;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (l106.freebsd.dk [192.168.60.106])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A0E69959;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7IBvNWb028519;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:23 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:55:05 +0300."
	<4A8A9699.1020808@freebsd.org> 
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:23 +0000
Message-ID: <28518.1250596643@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: on architecture of dumping 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:20 -0000

In message <4A8A9699.1020808@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon writes:

>>> I think that we should switch from current approach of hierarchically
>>> configuring dumper to having a hierarchy of dumpers.
>> 
>> I think this is utterly wolly thinking.
>
>'wolly'? Please improve my English.

Wolly as in "unclear".

>> The amount of complexity this will impose is staggering, and the potential
>> benefit is no where close to justifying it.
>
>I can't see the staggering complexity in the proposal, could you please expand?
>Example of what I had in mind (pseudo-code):

That may be the difference between you and me, I do see the complexity.

I suggest you try to implement it, it is probably just as fast as me
trying to convince you this is not simple.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.