From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 15:19:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA77510656A3; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AA88FC18; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lev.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9199CB0C7; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by lev.vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cBURRJl3gXjB; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B7C9CB882; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:46 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p11FJkYf028316; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:46 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20110201151946.GA28197@freebsd.org> References: <20110130172941.GA10701@freebsd.org> <20110131075439.GA49765@freebsd.org> <20110131095158.GC98011@freebsd.org> <20110201081236.GA63338@freebsd.org> <20110201112501.GA99666@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110201112501.GA99666@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: empty function macros X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:19:49 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:25:01AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > On Tue Feb 1 11, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:51:58AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > > On Mon Jan 31 11, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > no problem with this with clang :) > > > > > > hmmmmm....so compiling the following code > > > > > > int > > > main(int argc, char **argv) > > > { > > > if (1<2) > > > ; > > > } > > > > > > with clang -Werror code.c -o code works for you? > > > > if (1<2) > > ; > > > > gives a warning (and it should), on the other hand > > > > #define NOTHING > > > > if (1<2) > > NOTHING; > > > > does not warn, which is what you want right? > > actually > > #define NOTHING > > int > main(int argc, char **argv) > { > if (1<2) > NOTHING; > > return (0); > } > > *does* warn for me: > > otaku% clang test.c -o test > test.c:7:12: warning: if statement has empty body [-Wempty-body] > NOTHING; > ^ > 1 warning generated. are you using clang2.8? if so this is 2.9 feature then :)