From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 15:27:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738E73A50BE for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BMsnN10PMz4Fk0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1596727670; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZwK8TCLIVrvRlvPJxEA7F6b0d4qPLD3aqfdFAZ82hqI=; b=Ji5Dc9zrGKkTVJKHJEGAxycnCsjchtnsJcjXhlcWXPKMPaKFRHR4Q49ECUsuM0yZIQpgcD OJ9ai44ZbUpaYvx+whHYFaCxXxYE2ir1xTGHtLm1syb6EU7bgNEW6zufA0BQTmFW6U8A+h NFlrLjdScjRfgtHpOH/j6n5cGjbkGkc= Received: from amy.home (lfbn-idf2-1-1138-237.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.20.237]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4ce9bd23 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:27:49 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm Subject: Re: RockPro64 with latest image fails to boot? Message-Id: <20200806172749.2a893ce8a73616728b46cacf@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200801185716.a1c5a2972fdcf3a05902f256@bidouilliste.com> <010E3738-FB70-4A58-82A6-391252EB7A4B@gmail.com> <3D9B8A33-D537-4B21-B0BD-5E550A2294D7@gmail.com> <20200806121314.7b877e777f518db36c69f8a4@bidouilliste.com> <1B879FDB-31EA-4C53-90E3-E30CE51DF55D@gmail.com> <20200806135146.913617530d4e17ebcf133fb9@bidouilliste.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BMsnN10PMz4Fk0 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=Ji5Dc9zr; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.14 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.64)[-0.640]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:27:53 -0000 On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:19:41 +0200 S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: >=20 > > On 6 Aug 2020, at 13.51, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> However, it also fails with my previously good -current release, so th= at points pretty squarely at u-boot 2020.07. I?ll try to go back to 2020.04= (plus patches to find 4G etc). > >=20 > > What patches are you talking about ? >=20 > With the stock 2020.04 from ports I had to apply this patch manually to g= et u-boot to find all 4G?s of memory: >=20 That shouldn't be needed, I know I don't need it (same with others that have the boards and tested the latest image). So it's clear that your problem is DRAM related (which can explain the random freeeze or panic), but that doesn't really explain why you don't have problems with NetBSD, which version of u-boot are they using ? P.S.: That would have been good to start your recent mails by saying that you needed a patch for u-boot ... --=20 Emmanuel Vadot