From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:51:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C53216A4CE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:51:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CEC43D2D; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:51:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from xeon (xeon.unixathome.org [192.168.0.18]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D410D3D34; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:51:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille X-X-Sender: dan@xeon.unixathome.org To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200407282034.34549.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20040728145044.G61655@xeon.unixathome.org> References: <20040727223701.07D1B5D08@ptavv.es.net> <20040727211314.N80850@xeon.unixathome.org> <200407282034.34549.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: Joan Picanyol Subject: Re: /usr/ports/UPDATING announcement (was: Re: Xorg built fails on CURRENT: can't find Xauth.h) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:51:46 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 19:00, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > > I'm all for announcing it. =A0I never heard of it until last week. = =A0I too > > > was told to read it, I was stupid for not reading it, why aren't you > > > reading it > > Me too :o > > [...] > > > > It needs to go out on freebsd-announce IMHO. > > > > And the Handbook as well. > > That's all somewhat beside the point, IMHO (although it really should be > documented in the handbook). It was announced (here), many people saw it, > others didn't. And people will still miss things regardless of how many > places you announce them in. That is not an excuse for not announcing in the appropriate places. > The most effective way to spread the news actually _is_ the process you'v= e > been going through: Someone tells you in a more or less friendly way abou= t > some new thing (perhaps after you've been complaining about something in = a > more or less friendly way because you missed an announcement). Just ignor= e > the bozos who call you dumb and care about the useful pieces of > information. :) Yep, and if it had been sent to freebsd-announce, many more people would have read about it. current@ and doc@ is insufficient. --=20 Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/