From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Mar 14 03:38:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA23426
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:38:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA23417;
          Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:38:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA08253;
	Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:37:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell), current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: binutils bloat 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:12:45 +0100."
             <199803141112.MAA00597@sos.freebsd.dk> 
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:37:18 -0800
Message-ID: <8250.889875438@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be
> completely optional, preferably a port.

Ports are actually a really nasty solution for anything that might
involve building an eventual release, trust me!  Just breaking out the
SGML stuff for docs was painful enough, and that was exceedingly
peripheral.

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message