From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jan 26 00:30:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA20847 for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA20830 Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:30:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:30:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199601260830.AAA20830@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: J Wunsch Subject: Re: conf/972: inetd.conf should comment out k-services if no Kerberos present Reply-To: J Wunsch Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR conf/972; it has been noted by GNATS. From: J Wunsch To: gjbroom@kinsella.csc.UVic.CA Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/972: inetd.conf should comment out k-services if no Kerberos present Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:17:39 +0100 (MET) As Gord Broom wrote: > > By default, the CD-ROM doesn't contain any DES or kerberos code. > People in the USA and Canada can legally FTP the missing bits from > ftp.freebsd.org and install them. If you install kerb on one machine > but not another, remote logins to the unkerb-ed machine will fail because > inetd.conf thinks that kerberos is there. > >Fix: > > Comment out the offending lines from inetd.conf Hmm, the problem is that this f*** US policy causes us already a bunch of grey hears while making a release. Now, one of the distributions needs an inetd.conf with it and one needs an inetd.conf without it. Ick. :-(( -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)