From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 00:09:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF8016A4CE for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F6543D1D for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:09:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1J89fZV000355; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:09:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i1J89VhG000351; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:09:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:09:31 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040218.063204.74403147.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20040219025604.D76134@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <200402170846.17399.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> <20040218.063204.74403147.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:09:50 -0000 On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <39796.1077013415@critter.freebsd.dk> > "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: > : Current our handing is that if it disappears, it's gone, if it comes > : back it's probably a new one anyway. > > Yes. If the hardware goes away and comes back, it can be very > difficult to know if you have the same hardware or different > hardware. This is less true of network cards, but definitely true of > CF cards (which can easily be identical from inspection, but have > different contents). The likes of ATA disks include serial numbers in words 10-19. These could be used to positively identify a drive when its availability has come into question. From what I recall, CF cards use an ATA-like command set. Wouldn't it be possible to get the serial number and model from them for positive identification? Regards, Andy > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >