From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 26 20:49:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA14332 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 20:49:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from citytel1.citytel.net (root@citytel1.citytel.net [204.244.99.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA14327 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 20:49:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kwoody@citytel.net) Received: from mybsd.net (citytelprct48.citytel.net [204.244.99.124]) by citytel1.citytel.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA23047; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 20:58:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 20:19:46 -0800 (PST) From: Kwoody X-Sender: kwoody@mybsd.net To: Julian Elischer cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > if you have 8MB or maybe even 16MB it probably will be faster > due to having the extra RAM to play with.. 20 megs in this box. Have not really had much time to really see if anything does run better, (X for eg). > > there may also be some modules that you have left out that > slowed things down.. > but that's not usualy very noticable. > > congrats! thanks...was not even close to as hard as I thought it was going to be.