From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 09:48:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964F21065675 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@ctors.net) Received: from yorgi.telenet-ops.be (yorgi.telenet-ops.be [195.130.133.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEF28FC40 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@ctors.net) Received: from edna.telenet-ops.be (edna.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58]) by yorgi.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B90158990F for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:36:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 584EAE4004; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lis.ctors.local (dD576154D.access.telenet.be [213.118.21.77]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC49E4065; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <485B7A23.8060901@ctors.net> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:36:35 +0200 From: Tom Van Looy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Olander References: <20080619135114.Y1807@kozubik.com> <485AD73C.4080605@FreeBSD.org> <20080619154909.A1807@kozubik.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. Bounty established... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:48:31 -0000 Matt Olander wrote: > I have been working with Adobe management and the Flash development team > for quite some time. It seems, just as with the redistribution agreement > we worked out with them, the legal department is most likely the hold > up. I will have an update for the FreeBSD community within the next > couple of months. In the meantime, just in case, it could be worthwhile > to further our support of linux-flash9 under FreeBSD. Can we go "whine" at some Adobe address for this? Maybe when they see more individuals complaining, they will give this an higher priority? Kind regards, Tom