From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 16 13:53:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6343437B71A for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:53:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2GLt7w02001; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:55:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103162155.f2GLt7w02001@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Juha Saarinen" Cc: "Alfred Perlstein" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.x and BSDi 4.x binary compatible? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Mar 2001 10:50:40 +1300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:55:07 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > :: Actually, on the same note, I'm planning on flying a 747 jet later > :: this evening, anyone know what I should watch out for? Any tips > :: for a smooth ride? > > Yeah, don't pack the AK-47 and Semtex in the hand luggage. ;-) > > Thanks Alfie, I'll make sure to ask you next time I need some more useful > info. Actually, his point was a bit more subtle than that. You asked about binary incompatibility, but then talked about recompiling on FreeBSD. Your question was, in effect, a non sequiter; a point Alfred just tried to make clear. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message