From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 16 20: 4:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mx2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.112.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C9037B401 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from s1.optonline.net (s1.optonline.net [167.206.112.6]) by mx2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0H44Fn21437; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:04:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from optonline.net (ool-18be012f.dyn.optonline.net [24.190.1.47]) by s1.optonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0H44Fj13743; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:04:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A6519BE.653A00BC@optonline.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:04:14 -0500 From: trini0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kwangyul Seo , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ipf/ipnatd vs ipfw/natd ? References: <20010117122933.A11424@plus.or.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I prefer ipf/ipnat because the ruleset is less cryptic to decipher. Since I am/was a newbie, this meant the world to me. Kwangyul Seo wrote: > Hello, > > What's the main difference between ipfw/natd and ipf/ipnatd? > And where can I get detailed documents related to ipf/ipnatd? > > -- > Kwangyul Seo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- _____________________________ | trini0 | | | / ) | Systems Administrator | / / | Network Engineer | ( ( | email ==> | (((\ \> |/ ) trini0@optonline.net | (\\\\ \_/ /_________________________| \ / \ _/ / / / / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message