From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Oct  2 08:42:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA03117
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03100
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA21048;
	Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710021544.IAA21048@implode.root.com>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Oct 1997 08:09:41 PDT."
             <199710021509.IAA28884@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 08:44:23 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>How about the fact that a 2.2.2 release occured, but somthing built
>from the bits on the 2.2.0 branch report via uname that they are
>2.2-STABLE.  That is going down!

   No, "2.2" refers to the branch, not to a release. I think we make that
pretty clear.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project