From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 23 06:58:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1172377 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.citrix.com", Issuer "Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1D091950 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:58:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,480,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="267963589" Message-ID: <55602512.1090702@citrix.com> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:58:26 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= , FreeBSD XEN Subject: Re: Porting the block-iscsi hotplug script References: <553DEB97.5000300@entel.upc.edu> <5540A053.4080409@entel.upc.edu> <5540F3FC.80606@citrix.com> <5541FC8A.8080009@citrix.com> <5542365D.10403@entel.upc.edu> <55423ECD.6000404@citrix.com> <5556F21D.2050005@entel.upc.edu> <555EEFBA.5080902@citrix.com> <555EF542.3090002@citrix.com> <555F9B3F.1000600@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <555F9B3F.1000600@entel.upc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-DLP: MIA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 06:58:32 -0000 Hello, El 22/05/15 a les 23.10, Gustau PĂ©rez ha escrit: > I'll take a look at those patches. I'm not sure if I'll be able to > test them this weekend. No problem, I've already sent the patches upstream for review but I will make sure you can properly test them before they are committed. > My current kernel is a bit old (r281759 as of April 21th), and I'm > currently using the > 0001-xen-introduce-a-newbus-function-to-allocate-unused-m.patch. Has > this patch been integrated in HEAD? Yes, a proper fix for this issue was committed as r282634: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=282634 > I'm considering rebuild everything and then try your patches. > > Thanks for your efforts, Thanks for the testing, Roger.