From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 01:47:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8138416A423 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 01:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C3043D53 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 01:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k4P1lHL5077197; Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:17 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Jason Lixfeld Message-ID: <20060525014717.GG57363@dan.emsphone.com> References: <003501c67f7f$95f0fad0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Ansar Mohammed , 'Atom Powers' , 'FreeBSD Questions Mailing List' Subject: Re: Trouble with nss|pam|openldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 01:47:26 -0000 In the last episode (May 24), Jason Lixfeld said: > On 24-May-06, at 6:15 PM, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > > >Have you tried nss_ldap without pam? > > How is that even possible? It's possible, but not too useful. If you always force people to ssh in via keys, for example, you don't need pam_ldap. PAM only job is authentication, NSS handles everything after that. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com