From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 17 10:56:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA27275 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27269 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA07505; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 11:56:39 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199703171856.LAA07505@rover.village.org> To: James Mansion Subject: Re: Barb problem, FOUND Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Mar 1997 10:16:09 GMT." <332BC869.37B7@wgold.demon.co.uk> References: <332BC869.37B7@wgold.demon.co.uk> <199703160612.XAA13150@rover.village.org> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 11:56:39 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <332BC869.37B7@wgold.demon.co.uk> James Mansion writes: : In no way shape or form is an inline virtual function (destructor or : not) 'dunious'. Its quite legal. (Whether you might consider it to be : bad style is another matter. You can't always avoid it if the class is : a template, though that's clearly not the case with tvision) If compilers don't handle it, then the construct is dubious. :-) : If the compiler cannot handle code like this, then the compiler should : be fixed. Actually, it is a bug in the as program and it should be fixed. Warner