From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 23 16:04:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7DE16A4A6 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAF543D5C for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i28so729526nzi for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:04:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Hydplf9bIsbL5xluKh+g7qNHe2pB+xtRErBNBrrz5gn9TUnkX67L6GSnCzrRuFE0pPzwlVyQSQpFc5PQv0K8xZIk11QMkGq+jXtKP+mwBNR8BMT8Tat6sCTJyl6xJzFd1z2vfBcgQ24I6HY0hWGZddpzoiebzVX7QAYAwe+o7BE= Received: by 10.36.120.3 with SMTP id s3mr1025684nzc; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.22.74 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:04:20 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "Francisco Reyes" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <90B77A9F-FFE4-4227-80B1-FBF3DDC707B6@lafn.org> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Motherboards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:04:24 -0000 On 4/23/06, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin writes: > > > Well, I've heard that Google builds their newest servers > > almost exclusively on Opteron/Supermicro. > > Any public reference to that? > What was the source? > http://www.theregister.com/2006/03/11/supermicro_super_amd/