From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 12:58:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DC37B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 12:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilzcluster.liwest.at (lilzclust02.liwest.at [212.33.55.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F099D43F85 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm58-27.liwest.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at (8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM) id h47JwlF0001224273; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:58:47 +0200 (MEST) From: Daniela To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 21:59:14 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305072159.14539.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: Why is port 22 open by default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 19:58:52 -0000 I was just wondering: Is SSH really so secure that it can be on by default? I'm really paranoid, and I could sleep better if the answer was yes :-) Regards, Daniela