From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 15:52:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557391065673; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (host-80-81-242-12.violetlan.net [80.81.242.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAA98FC14; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2E011460; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:58:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from www.violetlan.net (mbali.violetlan.net [10.0.100.150]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448811426; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:58:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.41.34.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user freebsd@violetlan.net) by www.violetlan.net with HTTP; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:57:32 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <51890.217.41.34.61.1209131852.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> In-Reply-To: References: <61065.217.41.34.61.1209026488.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> <53948.217.41.34.61.1209032621.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> <58454.217.41.34.61.1209056031.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:57:32 +0100 (BST) From: "Reinhold" To: "Ivan Voras" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brindging ath0 with re0 working, kinda, almost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:52:19 -0000 On Fri, April 25, 2008 12:30, Ivan Voras wrote: > Reinhold wrote: > > >> Any help would be appreciated. >> > > I don't have any more suggestions, except the obvious: is there a > firewall somewhere in there, and are the routing tables ok? > > > yeah I have pf running, it needs to be on because its doing the load balancing on the two wan connections. Here is the netstat output for the routing table Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 121.212.313.414 UGS 0 162114 ng1 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 635 lo0 192.168.1.0/24 link#12 UC 0 0 bridge 192.168.1.1 d6.f4.fc.7c.95.38 UHLW 1 2 lo0 192.168.1.5 0.11.9.3b.f7.f0 UHLW 1 63563 bridge 848 loads of local ips 192.168.1.199 0.f.ea.66.8.7d UHLW 1 15958 bridge 869 112.221.331.441 111.222.333.444 UH 0 0 ng0 121.212.313.414 22.333.444.555 UH 1 0 ng1 Cheers Reinhold