From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 19:47:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E4A1065672; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from monthadar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8508FC0A; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so3001800iak.13 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:47:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kdaO/en3UsZ4Bh+atziMpxi4CZFZaY74tbXPqYtM4yU=; b=pgUKYFmFYMK3QRg/GgaXv6C0uOcfbvn5c1Zs2vQvq5HvWANAvAhk54BmYwE6vzjJn5 9nnEequHiPFkrPJTEKjG38JmyMzlqVHjx8qvfy9u8uXpeTCxKhXe3CF0XoSL0A2evZM+ CdjNILJIAw3DFJ8QVG55uoemPYYrzXHOH6r1E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.51.69 with SMTP id vh5mr21322223icb.32.1323892040529; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.51.233 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:47:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201112130935.33975.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:47:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: Monthadar Al Jaberi To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loop inside uma_zfree critical section X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:47:21 -0000 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:46:34 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am not sure why I am having this problem, but looking >>> at the code I dont understand uma_core.c really good. >>> So I hope someone can shed a light on this: >>> >>> I am running on an arm board and and running a kernel module >>> that behaves like a wlan interface. so I tx and rx packets. >>> >>> For now tx is only only sending beacon like frames. >>> This is done through using ieee80211_beacon_alloc(). >>> >>> Then in a callout task to generate periodic beacons: >>> >>> =A0 =A0 m_dup(avp->beacon, M_DONTWAIT); >>> =A0 =A0 mtx_lock(...); >>> =A0 =A0 STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(...); >>> =A0 =A0 taskqueue_enqueue(...); >>> =A0 =A0 mtx_unlock(...); >>> =A0 =A0 callout_schedule(...); >>> >>> On the RX side, the interrupt handler will read out buffer >>> then place it on a queue to be handled by wlan-glue code. >>> For now wlan-glue code just frees the mbuf it instead of >>> calling net80211 ieee80211_input() functions: >>> >>> =A0 =A0 m_copyback(...); >>> =A0 =A0 /* Allocate new mbuf for next RX. */ >>> =A0 =A0 MGETHDR(..., M_DONTWAIT, MT_DATA); >>> =A0 =A0 bzero((mtod(sc->Rx_m, void *)), MHLEN); >>> =A0 =A0 sc->Rx_m->m_len =3D 0; /* NB: m_gethdr does not set */ >>> =A0 =A0 sc->Rx_m->m_data +=3D 20; /* make headroom */ >>> >>> Then I use a lockmgr inside my kernel module that should >>> make sure that we either are on TX or RX path. >> >> Uh, you can't use a lockmgr lock in interrupt handlers or in >> if_transmit/if_start routines. =A0You should most likely just be using a= plain >> mutex instead. =A0Also, new code shouldn't use lockmgr in general. =A0If= you >> need a sleepable lock, use sx instead. =A0It has a more straightforward = API. > > Ok, I will change the interrupt handler to do something like this: > > =A0 =A0disaple_interrupt(); > =A0 =A0taskqueue_enqueue(...); /* on new rx task queue */ > > Then on the new rx proc: > > =A0 =A0sx_slock(...); > =A0 =A0m_copyback(...); > =A0 =A0enable_interrupt(); > =A0 =A0/* Allocate new mbuf for next RX. */ > =A0 =A0MGETHDR(..., M_DONTWAIT, MT_DATA); > =A0 =A0bzero((mtod(sc->Rx_m, void *)), MHLEN); > =A0 =A0sc->Rx_m->m_len =3D 0; /* NB: m_gethdr does not set */ > =A0 =A0sc->Rx_m->m_data +=3D 20; /* make headroom */ > =A0 =A0sx_sunlock(...); > > I lock TX/RX paths to make sure my code is threading safe. > Also because while programming my deivce (SPI communicatioin) > there will be a tsleep() waiting for the DMA interrupt and > thus we could be prempted by e.g. a beacon_callout etc... > I did implement your suggestions, using sx and modified interrupt handler as specified above. But still same problem as before. >> >>> The problem seems to be at [2], somehow after swapping >>> buckets in uma_zfree m_dup returns a pointer to >>> an mbuf that is still being used by us, [1] and [3] >>> have same address. >>> Then we call m_freem twice on same mbuf, [4] and [5]. >>> And a loop occurs inside uma_free. >>> I am using mbufs in a wrong way? Shouldnt mbufs be thread safe? >>> Problem seems to occur while swapping buckets. >> >> Hmm, the uma uses its own locking, so it should be safe, yes. =A0However= , you >> are correct about [1] and [3]. =A0The thing is, after [1] the mbuf shoul= dn't >> be in any buckets at all (it only gets put back into the bucket during a >> free). =A0Are you sure the mbuf wasn't double free'd previously? I rechecked and it is almost certain that I dont double free the mbuf before [1]. And its not like it crashed in the beginning, it does run for a while and then it crashes. So our code works for like a hundred beacons sent/rece= ived between two arm boards. Its feels like something is preempted, which explai= ns why the mbuf is still in the bucket (wrongly)? > > From my log I can only see the mbuf being used once before > by a beacon_callout and then it was freed by m_freem(). > So I cant see that it was freed twice before that. > > How can I go by debbuging this? > >> >> -- >> John Baldwin > > > > -- > Monthadar Al Jaberi --=20 Monthadar Al Jaberi