From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Nov 13 13:26:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA17315
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r33h77.res.gatech.edu (r33h77.res.gatech.edu [128.61.33.77])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA17308
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jason@localhost) by r33h77.res.gatech.edu (8.8.2/8.7.3) id QAA08111 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 16:25:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Jason Bennett <jason@r33h77.res.gatech.edu>
Message-Id: <199611132125.QAA08111@r33h77.res.gatech.edu>
Subject: Reject hunks?
To: ports@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 16:25:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


	When a port (say, fvwm or xemacs) claims when patching that it
is rejecting a hunk, what exactly is wrong? Running 3.0-current. It
also happened under 2.1.5-stable.

			jason

-- 
Jason Bennett, jbennett@cc.gatech.edu         | Member, Team OS/2! 
CS Major, Georgia Institute of Technology     | Senior TA, CS 1501!
Believer in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord   | VP-Comm, BSU!
http://bsu.gt.ed.net/jason/                   | finger for PGP key!