From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 21 10:31:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6004A37B422 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:29:11 -0700 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8LHUIM30796; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:30:18 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" To: Konan Houphoue Cc: ari@suutari.iki.fi, marcs@draenor.org, archie@whistle.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, virtual_olympus@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Port 80 redirect: Good news!! Message-ID: <20000921103018.B30474@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from bahobab@hotmail.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Konan Houphoue wrote: > #If you're using 'options BRIDGE', uncomment the following line to pass ARP > ${fwcmd} add 300 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0 > > I believe it is uncommented to keep the 2 interfaces on different network > but yet allowing local traffic on this computer. You are doing routing and NAT on this gateway, AND it is a bridge?! That's not a great idea. Did you really put, options BRIDGE In the kernel and flip the sysctl switches to turn bridging on? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message