From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 13:18:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA26D37B401 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (ip114.bella-vista.sfo.interquest.net [66.199.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E33B4400B for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:18:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5SKIFiP033548; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:18:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5SKIEh5033547; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:18:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:18:14 -0700 From: David Schultz To: David Leimbach Message-ID: <20030628201814.GA33532@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: David Leimbach , Julian Elischer , David Xu , current@freebsd.org References: <890E3745-A9A3-11D7-B882-0003937E39E0@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <890E3745-A9A3-11D7-B882-0003937E39E0@mac.com> cc: David Xu cc: Julian Elischer cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new KSE signal code X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:18:24 -0000 On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, David Leimbach wrote: > Because we aren't working on anything and need something to do... so we > find > ways to think about how we can enforce quality without understanding > how stuff > works first maybe? Umm...no, but thanks for the insult. How about: Because we are working at 3 AM to figure out why signals aren't getting delivered to java properly and we see an email saying that things will be more broken ``for a while'' and misinterpret what ``for a while'' means in this context. See previous post.