Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:45:18 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, eadler@FreeBSD.org, gjb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform Message-ID: <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1) The problem is not amd64 specific 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes too 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no useful progress messages Example failure log: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20111103071512/po= stfix-current-2.9.20111012,4.log Sahil Tandon p=ED=B9e v po 14. 11. 2011 v 21:24 -0500: > [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] >=20 > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: > >=20 > > .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" > > BROKEN=3D fails during installation > > .endif > >=20 > > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since > > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem > > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might > > be rectified in the near future? >=20 > Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main > development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 > machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and > marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've > enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the > conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your > amd64 environment, and report the results?=20 >=20 > Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can > portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 > pointyhat machine? >=20 --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> Two sausages are in a frying pan. One says, "Geez, it's hot in here isn't it?" And the other one says, "Aaaaaah! A talking sausage!" --=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7CNKkACgkQntdYP8FOsoIWMQCgjALErTQiWg6yuSLZkvo9XQ29 YAkAnjdMRCEKYLFJSk7E9ryF5ICbWML2 =QYi9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1321350319.84509.2.camel>