From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 04:28:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7247016A41F for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:28:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asym@rfnj.org) Received: from mail.rfnj.org (ns1.rfnj.org [66.180.172.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E023F43D7B for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asym@rfnj.org) Received: by mail.rfnj.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 821342E3; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:27:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from megalomaniac.rfnj.org (ool-45736df1.dyn.optonline.net [69.115.109.241]) by mail.rfnj.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37452D5; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050722002806.03860150@mail.rfnj.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:28:41 -0400 To: markzero , ender From: asym In-Reply-To: <20050722030707.GA39218@logik.ath.cx> References: <42e0044a.3317306b.5585.30fe@mx.gmail.com> <42E058BC.9070004@tog.net> <20050722030707.GA39218@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on rfnj.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=20.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: Adding OpenBSD sudo to the FreeBSD base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:28:05 -0000 At 23:07 7/21/2005, markzero wrote: >On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:23:56PM -0400, ender wrote: > > Stephen Major wrote: > > > > If sudo offered the opportunity for more features, but by default > > behaved exactly the same way as su, I would see no disadvantages to > > replacing su with sudo. Am i missing something? > >What happens if you maintain systems that don't need sudo? You don't use the additional features. That was a hard one. Next?