Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:41:48 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net> Subject: Re: Sticky/sgid/suid bits safe on regular files? Message-ID: <200406221741.48309.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <xzpeko8koa3.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040617205549.GA19254@lava.net> <200406221659.31501.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <xzpeko8koa3.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:38, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> writes: > > I think he wanted to use sticky/sgid/suid because they get removed when > > the file is changed > > no they don't. Oops, guess I'm used to using vi which does move/unlink - sorry! > > so the application can go back and see if they've been > > changed. That doesn't happen to attributes. > > > > Also, I don't think attributes work over NFS(?) > > they should, at least with v4. Ahh neat :) =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA1+nE5ZPcIHs/zowRArgLAJ9G1O5G3m7yhUdhPNJ+9akvIPQrawCcDEok dtSRkR0D9sDR2xVqosxUA6Q=3D =3D45iX =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406221741.48309.doconnor>