From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Mar 19 18:23:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA21720
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA21705
          Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA25663; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:16:05 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199603200216.TAA25663@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: new sup server
To: julian@ref.tfs.com (JULIAN Elischer)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:16:05 -0700 (MST)
Cc: mmead@Glock.COM, dima@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199603191758.JAA02581@ref.tfs.com> from "JULIAN Elischer" at Mar 19, 96 09:58:57 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> In fact what is the lag behing all the servers..
> can we find out the update schedules for them?
> it helps US shedule OUR updates..

If they updated 3 times a day, you wouldn't care which server you got
if all you updated was once a day.

Lag time is only required for 2 or less updates a day by the secondary.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.