From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 13:10:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69216A4CF for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao06.cox.net (lakemtao06.cox.net [68.1.17.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D762843F93 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:10:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031112211045.HVDO24575.lakemtao06.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:10:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:09:49 -0600 To: Franz Klammer References: <3FB29A44.8000702@webonaut.com> <1068669620.770.59.camel@gyros> <1068670630.770.73.camel@gyros> <3FB2A05C.7010507@webonaut.com> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3FB2A05C.7010507@webonaut.com> User-Agent: Opera7.21/Linux M2 build 497 cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: distname without version-number X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:10:48 -0000 On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:04:28 +0100, Franz Klammer wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:54, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:40:20 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:38, Franz Klammer wrote: >>>> >>>>> hi! >>>>> >>>>> what should i do if i want to make a port with no version number? >>>>> >>>> Give it a bogus version like 1.0 (it's the first FreeBSD port of this >>>> software). PORTVERSION is required, and it has to be parsable by >>>> pkg_version. >>>> >>> Or, give the date when the tarball was created like yearmonthday >>> (20031211). I think, this is better. :-) >>> >> >> Except, it looking at the port, when the distfile is re-rolled, you'll >> get checksum mismatches. It might be better to host snapshots of the >> distfile on your own server, Franz, and do what Jeremy suggests: >> >> seti-2003.11.12.tar.gz >> >> > ok! i will do that. this what i've already done with another port. > but i hoped there is a better solution. > sorry joe for the (also off-list) noice with this litte port. > tomorrow you get the updated pr. The best solution is to ask the developers if they can change the name of tarball in the future version. Also, explain the reasons. I did it once and it works. :-) Cheers, Mezz > franz. > >> Joe >> >> >>> Cheers, >>> Mezz >>> >>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>>> franz. -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.