From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Mar 16 13:54:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6087E37B71A; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:54:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from juha@saarinen.org)
Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=DENDENNIS)
	by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 14e2An-000229-03; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 10:54:13 +1300
From: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@saarinen.org>
To: "Mike Smith" <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@wintelcom.net>,
	"freebsd-stable@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.x and BSDi 4.x binary compatible? 
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 10:57:20 +1300
Message-ID: <LNBBIBDBFFCDPLBLLLHFGECLJHAA.juha@saarinen.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <200103162155.f2GLt7w02001@mass.dis.org>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:: Actually, his point was a bit more subtle than that.
::
:: You asked about binary incompatibility, but then talked about
:: recompiling
:: on FreeBSD.  Your question was, in effect, a non sequiter; a
:: point Alfred
:: just tried to make clear. 8)

Yes, I realised I formulated myself poorly... lotsa caffeine this morning
;-).

Anyway, trial and error and all that coming up.

Cheers,

-- Juha


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message