Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:55:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Riccardo.Veraldi@fi.infn.it Cc: <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem I Cannot solve Message-ID: <15152.40285.692168.905556@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106201106550.7394-100000@nikita.fi.infn.it> References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106201106550.7394-100000@nikita.fi.infn.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Did you even _read_ the email I sent you about this when you first asked about it?? I've appended that email. I'm still waiting to hear back from David O'Brien as to what changed in the toolchain & when it changed. I have no idea what the right "ports" way to really fix this is. The problem here is that xemacs21's patch-aj is setting up a special case for alpha which omits /usr/lib/crti.o and /usr/lib/crtn.o. I don't pay much attention to such things. I assume these files did not exist on the alpha at some point in the past, but the toolchain changed sometime prior to 4.3-RELEASE so these files now exist on the alpha. When did that change occur? Is it far enough in the past so that it is safe to simply cvs rm that patch? Drew >>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:05:24 -0400 (EDT) >>To: Riccardo.Veraldi@fi.infn.it >>Cc: <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> >>Subject: Re: GCC problem ?? >>In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105301201390.3488-100000@nikita.fi.infn.it> >>References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105301201390.3488-100000@nikita.fi.infn.it> >>X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid >> >>More like a gnu-configure-being-to-smart-for-its-own-damned-good problem. >>The following appears to work: >> >>rm files/patch-aj >> >>Drew >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15152.40285.692168.905556>