From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jun  9  7:59: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.30])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8FDD937C2BE; Fri,  9 Jun 2000 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com)
Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.6])
	by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA00549;
	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:58:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from privatelabs.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by misha.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03069;
	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:01:25 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi@privatelabs.com)
From: mi@privatelabs.com
Message-Id: <200006091301.JAA03069@misha.privatelabs.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: ports/19047: net/arpwatch patched to use tmpfile() instead of m
 ktemp()
To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200006090726.AAA95301@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On  9 Jun, sobomax@FreeBSD.org wrote:
= Synopsis: net/arpwatch patched to use tmpfile() instead of mktemp()
= 
= State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
= State-Changed-By: sobomax
= State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 9 00:24:07 PDT 2000
= State-Changed-Why: 
= Another patch committed. Anyway thanks for reporting and please in the future 
= try to be more cooperative and keep your ego under control.
= 
= http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19047

I maintain, there was nothing wrong with my patch on any of the
Operating Systems in scope.  My earlier reference to my ego was
to explain my reluctance to compromise in that particular case,
not to admit a flaw in the patch. Respectfully,

	-mi



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message