Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:59:09 -0600 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Volker <volker@vwsoft.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: licensing question APSL Message-ID: <20080214195909.GA21030@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <47B49AB6.1040609@vwsoft.com> References: <47B3E21F.1010202@vwsoft.com> <20080214150200.GB18534@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <47B49023.20204@vwsoft.com> <20080214191737.GA20098@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <47B49AB6.1040609@vwsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:47:02PM +0100, Volker wrote: > On 02/14/08 20:17, Brooks Davis wrote: > > APSL is not generally accepted in the base. It may be acceptable in > > certain circumstances, but strong technical justification is generally > > required for inclusion. >=20 > Brooks, >=20 > so better put that into the ports tree? It could go into ports without issue. If it's functionality people need in the base then perhaps a case could be made, but at a glance it doesn't look like these really qualify. -- Brooks --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHtJ2NXY6L6fI4GtQRAoyKAKC9JfGaABQhVj7lq+fiHmrdMLFhlwCdH+m0 VVL9AxX3SeVvuoJlEsqBpNU= =rXX0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080214195909.GA21030>