From owner-freebsd-translators@freebsd.org Tue Mar 22 21:44:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-translators@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60189AD9B6D for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C9E122F; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w20so137727087oia.2; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv0VT1G8SpJuVfOntuL0EGwqWP6hL0xUN9QghqzW/Y8=; b=qKrUOcBwSUowElPmb4MGjqFstgK+6aa2Pi4Zc4MEGAoqKUz72UuvbWHmo5pH1G5nvG PHQfyrRtjm5af7TQdv2Q2zYOipvhWGj17ehs0uPn+LIX/VOJqIxw4iOdVOXuE3Ccj4Xl RQC37hAsvjt7Bx2vhrTDYqECclOCwGp578ONsSCWa7jSsN26vYcvB/4B4pdWYSvgBgMR SSOPfsa1Kh0igsZIfKtFKsGBXFEc2nAwnTEBQkuVofUhuU9CzC/sJeWejEMA1eYfzwVy zIqczAw4yy4kkznRnLrEmdDem9QtdQFuJO58jkuoCenXR9+IuDxD7spoa9QPe9BMgXwj cl7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv0VT1G8SpJuVfOntuL0EGwqWP6hL0xUN9QghqzW/Y8=; b=T4W6p2nWML508G0iiAXt0lcyk815dAzDVa1W+aOa3aIQrnDfYe/DI7jFCY5rqnDBe5 ymBdJUBeeRY8LSM4F+MFjWSeW5Pczg8lSdFIQjp8hMEzsfYdbSBoUeLWo8V9AFqvOWLt ZLptYr0aEkqjnlnfznU3a9DNkYAArjWKZU0r6aKJ9ocnLQYFvI6FgQcIFGt43QfobEhi x4nKvvY3IhA4UejlVeN89Nii9mOJfCpnfcCLW04m5I6tnQ/4/yLcXAOCXOWY/CzzNv+8 DAUyephCvWRV0Um8tZwc0fKzzpWBW5DRy1czKTbKsj3mWQCEkI9IKm0XHX1CAYegan2G 0nhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLbxO7HvAQUz7FoqXC9/D5VMv7CXdb+1lv/27kta8oKiRH+7k9z3GnAUo4epaIGLj4w/eiVKt0Ozb1Yiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.225.65 with SMTP id y62mr18885262oig.73.1458683061262; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.227.228 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:44:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cOfuULhoqskSYrVogujeE9oNPs8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Phabricator review for Pootle 2.7.2 available From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= To: Warren Block Cc: freebsd-translators@freebsd.org, Groff TheBSDGoat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-translators@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Translators List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:44:22 -0000 2016-02-17 4:07 GMT+01:00 Warren Block : > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Ren=C3=A9 Ladan wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just created https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5305 which contains an >> update for the current Pootle 2.5.1.3 to version 2.7.2. >> >> It does not pass all tests yet, so I'm not really confident to commit it >> yet. >> >> Feel free to add comments, subscribe, or even improve the patch. >> >> As indicated in the test plan, I might set up a test instance on my >> server. > > > Thank you for working on this! I set up a test instance of Pootle 2.7.2 on my server on port 8000 using the 'pip' method as described on http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/pootle/en/latest/server/installatio= n.html For now this is only available locally as it is probably insecure and not hooked up to a sub-domain of rene-ladan.nl yet. Although the instructions are a bit Linux-centric, the 'pip' installation was not that hard, no modifications other than to pootle.conf were necessary. The next steps will be running some tests and see if the port needs changes (I remember some tests failing, but maybe that happens with the 'pip' installation too). After that, deploy it on the cluster? Regards, Ren=C3=A9 --=20 http://www.rene-ladan.nl/