From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 14:11:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2BE1065672; Mon, 12 May 2008 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1D8FC0C; Mon, 12 May 2008 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4CDswmM037572; Mon, 12 May 2008 07:54:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <48284C32.5060707@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:54:58 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kirkwood References: <29626.214.13.212.30.1210554531.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <53004.80.91.220.50.1210576570.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <20080512072316.GA3845@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <58131.80.91.220.50.1210577810.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <20080512074541.GA4667@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <4827F91E.60102@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <4827F91E.60102@paradise.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , stable@freebsd.org, jonathan@kc8onw.net Subject: Re: ATA APM and NCQ support in FreeBSD atacontrol X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:11:27 -0000 Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> >> I am too, but PRs that are 2 years old which include patches for severe >> bugs that affect reliability of RAID is (in my opinion) not acceptable. >> I've been spanked over saying this before ("you don't understand how >> open source works"), but necessity easily supercedes idealism. >> >> Linux's libata has evolved very quickly and very well, and has multiple >> eyes familiar with the code (in the case the author takes vacation, >> etc.). It has the upper hand here. >> >> > Linux has more eyes period, which helps a lot. In addition Linux has > more commercial sponsorship - having said that, I've no idea if libdata > development has had any such sponsorship... > > However. I do agree that we (that is FreeBSD) need more folks brave > enough to help Soren out with the (S)ATA layer - that means people like > you or me deciding to get our hands dirty with this code... > I'm working on adding ATA/SATA support to CAM. Scott