From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 14 03:42:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA24407 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:42:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sos.freebsd.dk (sos.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA24314; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:42:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@sos.freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by sos.freebsd.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16622; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:41:48 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from sos) Message-Id: <199803141141.MAA16622@sos.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: binutils bloat In-Reply-To: <8250.889875438@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Mar 14, 98 03:37:18 am" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:41:48 +0100 (MET) Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG From: Søren Schmidt Reply-to: sos@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote: > > If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be > > completely optional, preferably a port. > > Ports are actually a really nasty solution for anything that might > involve building an eventual release, trust me! Just breaking out the > SGML stuff for docs was painful enough, and that was exceedingly > peripheral. You mean you would build all the different machine releases on ONE platform ??? That will be quite a task :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end .. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message