Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 22:11:19 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: Why to use HTTPD for 2.1 Message-ID: <199504012011.WAA00643@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199504011736.JAA06143@ix2.ix.netcom.com> from "Paul Vinciguerra" at Apr 1, 95 09:36:32 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Paul Vinciguerra wrote: > > I think that HTTPD *SHOULD* be part of 2.1... I don't understand why item #1 and #2 of your list would require an HTTP *daemon*. IMHO, only a reader would be required. The man pages need also to stay in `normal' form. (Unless someone bothers to write a `man' command that uses HTML and has a user interface like `man'.) I'm certainly not the only one who would be totally upset if typing ``man ls'' doesn't do what it's expected to do... -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504012011.WAA00643>