Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 20:01:19 -0500 (EST) From: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> To: Paul Everlund <tdv94ped@cs.umu.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE, NAT and IPDIVERT Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203262000120.69439-100000@xena.gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0203261111410.3493-100000@bark.cs.umu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Paul Everlund wrote: > Hi! > > I have two questions I hope someone can answer: > > 1. When using PPPoE and ppp. Is there any advantage using > ppp's own NAT over IPFW's NAT? Why should I use ppp's > NAT instead of IPFW's, or why shouldn't I use it? If you're using ppp, it's probably best to use ppp's nat support. > 2. If I use ppp's NAT, do I have to compile IPDIVERT into > the kernel? No. That's one of the major benefits of ppp's NAT. -- Matt Emmertony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0203262000120.69439-100000>