From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 19:24:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB65FBA for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F052A7E for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75JOP9t050570 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:24:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192404] [EXP-RUN] Pull in linux-c6 compat layer Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:24:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cjpugmed@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:24:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192404 --- Comment #4 from Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #3) > I think this may be required once this hits the tree: >=20 > Index: sys/compat/linux/linux_mib.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- sys/compat/linux/linux_mib.c (revision 269592) > +++ sys/compat/linux/linux_mib.c (working copy) > @@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ >=20=20 > static struct linux_prison lprison0 =3D { > .pr_osname =3D "Linux", > - .pr_osrelease =3D "2.6.16", > + .pr_osrelease =3D "2.6.18", > .pr_oss_version =3D 0x030600, > - .pr_osrel =3D 2006016 > + .pr_osrel =3D 2006018 > }; Yes, with this change we don't need anymore tweak 'compat.linux.osrelease' = in /etc/sysctl.conf --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=