Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 13:16:08 +0000 From: Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: "synth" in a jail Message-ID: <SN1PR20MB2109B06C50E3E6C1AA435BD880340@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <20180825203109.mfuewnu2l7sq6dvu@privacychain.ch> References: <SN1PR20MB2109D5EDEDB0DB20920B4B8A80350@SN1PR20MB2109.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <20180825203109.mfuewnu2l7sq6dvu@privacychain.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <owner-freebsd- questions@freebsd.org> On Behalf Of Alex > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2018 4:31 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: "synth" in a jail > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 07:40:59PM +0000, Carmel NY wrote: > > I have a dumb question, but is it possible or advisable to run "synth" > > in a jail to update the application(s) installed in the jail? > > This is not necessary because Synth build ports in a chroot, and so a clean > environment, but if you do insist its GitHub page have some pointers to do > that: > > https://github.com/jrmarino/synth > > Cheers! I think you are confused regarding my question. I wanted to know if it was advisable to use "synth" to update applications that are located in a "jail." Obviously, "synth" would have to be run from the jail also. -- Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SN1PR20MB2109B06C50E3E6C1AA435BD880340>