From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 19:53:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D0F1065670 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@freebsd.org) Received: from swip.net (mailfe04.swip.net [212.247.154.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BFE8FC16 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:53:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=gl0LPzB4YDQuuzpDoHYit7deEV0cOo++Sg28kyvF6vg= c=1 sm=1 a=pgHCOPxoMUAA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=mhfhUBuGQBTWmkyU4Z0A:9 a=699MjKgiiZtrpVag8-ou2JKZBvYA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:117 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 30695625; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:53:06 +0200 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=mailfe04.swip.net; client-ip=188.126.201.140; envelope-from=hselasky@freebsd.org From: Hans Petter Selasky To: pyunyh@gmail.com Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:54:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4CA94B13.7020809@freebsd.org> <20101004192908.GD4814@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20101004192908.GD4814@michelle.cdnetworks.com> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010042154.18353.hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-usb@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Network TX/RX fairness is not honored by USB stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:53:09 -0000 > Personally I'd like to nuke the use of interrupt endpoint here but > want to hear Han's opinion before doing that. If no data is ever transmitted except zero length packets, you can just nuke it. Rest of patch looks Ok. --HPS