From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 09:56:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8C116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from outhub3.tibco.com (outhub3.tibco.com [63.100.100.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE1843D53 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from BVanValz@tibco.com) Received: from outhub1.tibco.com (outhub1.tibco.com [63.100.100.155]) by outhub3.tibco.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0UHtsVJ011298; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from nodnsquery(10.106.128.33) by outhub1.tibco.com via csmap id 3af2e7a2_534d_11d8_9d76_00304811db0b_17660; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from Tin.War.Tibco.Com (Tin.PGM.war.tibco.com [10.97.128.50]) i0UHtrr8005956; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.97.128.77] (NewStorm.war.tibco.com [10.97.128.77]) by Tin.War.Tibco.Com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0UHtrOs018619; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:55:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from BVanValz@Tibco.Com) From: Bob Van Valzah To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075485353.83564.63.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:55:53 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:56:04 -0000 I've done some local ports before and I know enough about multicast routing that I stand a chance of being able to come up with some suitable patches. I even have a good test environment for it here with Ciscos running PIM. I probably won't have time to come up with an extensive patch set, but I could probably make something work if the amount of patching required is more modest. Where would I find the sources to get started porting/patching? Thanks, Bob On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:45, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > > I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. > > I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any > > user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support > > would be present with no routing daemon. Am I missing something > > obvious? > > We don't have pimsd or pimdd for IPv4 in ports at the moment. > Patches will be gratefully accepted! > > BMS